The Supreme Court asked the Indian government if it plans to construct a border wall to curb illegal immigration, particularly from Bangladesh. The court stressed the importance of national security while recognizing the cultural and linguistic ties shared by communities across borders. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta argued against the petitioners’ claims, emphasizing the need for individual complainants to substantiate allegations of wrongful deportation. The court called for clarity on the procedures for addressing the rights of those within Indian territory, while also acknowledging the complexities of immigration issues faced by various nations. This debate highlights the delicate balance between national security interests and humanitarian considerations.