US President Donald Trump has reiterated claims of having played a crucial role in averting a significant conflict between nuclear-armed India and Pakistan, referencing a tense episode where he alleges seven aircraft were shot down. Trump asserts that his direct intervention, by contacting leaders from both nations to warn them of potential economic repercussions, was instrumental in preventing escalation, a narrative echoed by Pakistani leadership, including Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, who praised Trump as a “man of peace.” Despite these claims, Indian officials have consistently maintained that any agreements on cessation of hostilities were reached through direct dialogue between military leaders, rather than mediation by the US. The broader significance of this narrative lies in the geopolitical dynamics of South Asia, where perceptions of external mediation can influence public sentiment and policy. While Trump’s portrayal may enhance his image as a global peacemaker, it raises questions about the complexities of Indo-Pak relations and the implications of external influences on regional stability. The discourse also reflects the ongoing strategic competition in the region, underscoring India’s position in managing its security concerns independently, despite external claims of mediation.